Cases 121 - 130 of 220
Young et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv16943
Plaintiff:
Patricia L. Young and Ernest K. Young
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miguel Diaz v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 13-16318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden, Warden, K. YOUNG, Associate Warden, RIVAS, CCII and others
Waste Connections, Inc. v. John Chevedden, et al
as 13-20336
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WASTE CONNECTIONS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN CHEVEDDEN, JAMES MCRITCHIE and MYRA K. YOUNG
In re: John Young
as 13-2525
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JOHN K. YOUNG
Defendant - Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Ahmed v. Ringler et al
as 2:2013cv01050
Plaintiff:
Abdikidar Ahmed
Defendant:
S. Ringler, A. Scotland and K. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olson v. University of Washington
as 2:2013cv00782
Plaintiff:
W. GARY OLSON
Defendant:
Edwina S. Uehara , Richard Cordova , Shari Spung and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tennyson et al v. Bank of America
as 3:2013cv01111
Plaintiff:
Lou Ellen Tennyson , Aubrey Diane Holifield , Janice K. Young and others
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
David K. Young Consulting, LLC v. Arnold
as 5:2013cv00149
Defendant:
Craig C Arnold
Plaintiff:
David K. Young Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Arnold & Company, LLC vs. David K. Young Consulting
as 5:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
Craig Arnold and Arnold & Company, LLC
Defendant:
David K. Young Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Waste Connections, Inc. v. Chevedden et al
as 4:2013cv00176
Plaintiff:
Waste Connections, Inc.
Defendant:
John Chevedden, James McRitchie and Myra K. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
