Cases 131 - 140 of 239
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2016cv80150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621
Beau Briones v. Fitness International, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Beau Briones
Defendant:
Does, Fitness & Sports Clubs, LLC, Fitness International, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BROOKS v. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01557
Plaintiff:
RODREGIS A. BROOKS
Defendant:
FITNESS INTERNATIONAL LLC and BRENT LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
United States of America v. American Express Company
as 15-1672
Amicus Curiae:
Michael A. Carrier, Law Professor, Bridgestone Americas Inc., Nestle Waters North America Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Saks Incorporated, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Ohio and others
Defendant / Appellant:
American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. and American Express Company
Defendant:
Visa Inc. and Mastercard International Incorporated
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii
Williams v. Fitness International, LLC
as 8:2015cv01400
Plaintiff:
Almenesh Williams
Defendant:
Fitness International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
