Cases 131 - 140 of 75,124
Jones v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02110
Petitioner:
Michael Contrez Jones
Respondent:
Warden Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albert Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution
as 24-6557
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HUDGINS, Sergeant, MOTLEY, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
MUHAMMAD v. ARMFIELD et al
as 2:2024cv02553
Petitioner:
WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
JAMES ARMFIELD, AL MILES, WILBUR JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martin v. Putman et al
as 3:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Erwin D. Martin
Defendant:
Eric Putman, f/n/u Allen, Michael Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wheatley v. D'Apolito et al.
as 4:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Tiffany D. Wheatley
Defendant:
Hon. Anthony D'Apolito, Gina DeGenova, Katherine Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv02403
Plaintiff:
Cameron Reynard Allen
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Officer Jones, Officer Kirkland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv02404
Plaintiff:
Jaylen L. Johnson
Defendant:
Capt. Johnson, Chief Rugg, Lt. Cleaves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
