Cases 131 - 140 of 827,537
Gutierrez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01902
Petitioner:
Leonardo Gutierrez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Indiana Public Retirement System v. Agilon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Indiana Public Retirement System
Defendant:
Agilon Health, Inc., Steven J. Sell, Timothy S. Bensley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Ledezma v. Contact US Teleservices
as 2:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Filiberto Ledezma
Defendant:
Contact US Teleservices Inc; a Texas Corporation doing business as Atento doing business as Atento US
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Whybark v. Whalen et al
as 2:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Marcus Whybark
Defendant:
Carl D. Whalen and Kenneth P. Fredericksen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McColl v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
James John McColl
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farm Credit of The Virginias, ACA v. Depoy
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Farm Credit of The Virginias, ACA
Defendant:
Walter Kim Depoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk07484
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amado v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2024at00405
Plaintiff:
Sarah Irene Amado
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Kacy Lelievre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Defenders of Wildlife and Sierra Club
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, Michael Oetker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
