Cases 151 - 159 of 159
Croxton v. US Dept of Veteran Affairs
as 3:2007cv00834
Plaintiff:
Mandell Croxton
Defendant:
US Dept of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Veterans Affairs
as 07-1955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL L. RICHARDSON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATION DIRECTOR OF DEPT. OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DIRECTOR VAMC - HAMPTON, DR. HUFFLER and others
Cormier et al v. USA et al
as 6:2007cv01492
Plaintiff:
Racie Mae Richard Cormier, Mona Marie Cormier, Carey Jacob Cormier and others
Defendant:
USA, Dept of Veterans Affairs and Veterans Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Pickett v. Whitten et al
as 1:2007cv01458
Plaintiff:
Keisha Pickett
Defendant:
Pearlie Whitten, Sadie Williams Joffrion, Andrew Ballot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Jones et al v. Illinois Dept of Veteran's Affairs et al
as 1:2007cv03729
Plaintiff:
Karen Jones, Jay'Corey Jones, Arbrianna Young and others
Defendant:
Illinois Dept of Veteran's Affairs and Kentucky Dept of Veteran's Avvairs
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Brand v. O'Connell, et. al
as 4:2007cv00177
Plaintiff:
Heidi Brand
Defendant:
Matthew O'Connell, Kristi Starkey, U.S. Dept. of Veteran's Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Brand
as 4:2007at10078
Plaintiff:
Heidi Brand
Defendant:
Matthew O'Connell, Kristi Starkey, U.S. Dept. of Veteran's Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Wood v. USA/Dept. of Veterans Affairs
as 3:2006cv00116
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Wood
Defendant:
USA/Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ramirez-Carlo, et al v. United States
as 06-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SILVESTRE RAMIREZ-CARLO and FRANCISCA PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
