Cases 11 - 20 of 11,236
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Fields, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biagini v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 3:2024cv03364
Plaintiff:
MAY JOY S. BIAGINI
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Caplan v. PPG Architectural Finishes Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv22137
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
PPG Architectural Finishes Inc. a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as PPG PAINTS and May Property Acquisitions LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Obamedo v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04560
Plaintiff:
Marlo Latrice Obamedo
Defendant:
Dart and Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01322
Plaintiff:
Kelly Virginia May
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fredricks v. May et al
as 9:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredricks and Nigel Fredericks
Defendant:
C. May and John Doe Correction Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Carter et al
as 5:2024ct03138
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal and Christopher Lee Neal
Defendant:
RN Teresa Carter, P.A. Erica Kearney, Nurse Cora Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02357
Plaintiff:
Julius Hayes
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, Shelby County Sheriff Department, Floyd Bonner, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2024cv01386
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Logan May
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
