Cases 11 - 20 of 82
JOHNSON v. DAVIS
as 3:2022cv02094
Plaintiff:
ANDREW E. JOHNSON JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN and BRUCE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. City of Cheyenne, et al
as 22-8015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHEYENNE, a municipal corporation, LANCE COOPER OVERSTREET, administrator of the estate of George W. Stanford, deceased and ALAN W. SPENCER, an individual and and Does 2 through 20, inclusive
(HC) Johnson v. State of California
as 2:2022cv00536
Petitioner:
Andrew Johnson, Andrew D. Johnson and Andrew Cliff Johnson
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Johnson v. Bouldin et al
as 3:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Andrew Young Johnson
Defendant:
David Bouldin, David Patterson, Shawn Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Andrew Johnson
as 21-1795
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW DREW JOHNSON
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03140
Plaintiff:
Andrew C. Johnson and ANDREW C JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson #461453 v. Morrison
as 1:2021cv00549
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
Petitioner:
Andrew Mack Johnson #461453, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv18722
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JACKSON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12069
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW THOMAS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
