Cases 11 - 20 of 80
C. et al v. Aspen Dental Management, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
C. C., K. F., C. M. and others
Defendant:
Aspen Dental Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
IPAP LLC v. Aspen Dental
as 2:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
IPAP LLC doing business as Aspen Dental of Cache Valley
Defendant:
Aspen Dental Management
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
IPAP LLC v. Aspen Dental
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
IPAP LLC doing business as Aspen Dental of Cache Valley
Defendant:
Aspen Dental Management
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Santos v. Aspen Dental
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Ginell D Santos
Defendant:
Aspen Dental
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Briksza et al v. Fontana et al
as 2:2023cv11487
Plaintiff:
Etelka Briksza, Robert Briksza, Mirsha Lopez and others
Defendant:
Bob Fontana, Justin Griffee, Bill Wodjak and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Willamet Dental et al
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Joy Miller
Defendant:
Willamet Dental, Providence Park Orthopedics, Aspen Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
