Cases 11 - 20 of 123
Geronimi v. Dickinson County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Geronimi
Defendant:
Dickinson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Friese v. Paul
as 6:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Reddick Friese
Defendant:
Andrew Paul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
PAUL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19589
Plaintiff:
TYLER ANDREW PAUL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrew Paul Leonard v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv07223
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Leonard
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc., David Steenblock doing business as STEMGEVITY.COM, DOES 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
IDOL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16149
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PAUL IDOL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLTKAMP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16123
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PAUL LEE HOLTKAMP, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jenkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Andrew Paul Jenkins
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
PAUL v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00471
Petitioner:
LEE ANDREW PAUL
Respondent:
T.J WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MCGOVERN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57271
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PAUL MCGOVERN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
