Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv03412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Meyers v. Haysi Regional et al
as 7:2019cv00694
Plaintiff:
Anthony Meyers
Defendant:
Dr. Holbart, Haysi Regional and Krystal Large
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyer et al v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
as 4:2018cv03952
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Anthony Meyer and Karen Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
USA v. Meyers
as 6:2019cv03202
Defendant:
Anthony Meyers
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246
Meyers v. Unknown
as 2:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
Anthony Meyers
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amber Gascho, et al v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, et al
as 17-3822
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMBER GASCHO, ASHLEY BUCKENMEYER, MICHAEL J HOGAN and others
Defendant:
GLOBAL FITNESS HOLDINGS, LLC, doing business as Urban Active and DAHL ADMINISTRATION, LLC
Interested Party - Appellant:
STEPHEN PAUL
Amber Gascho, et al v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, et al
as 17-3821
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMBER GASCHO, ASHLEY BUCKENMEYER, MICHAEL J HOGAN and others
Defendant:
GLOBAL FITNESS HOLDINGS, LLC, doing business as Urban Active and DAHL ADMINISTRATION, LLC
Interested Party - Appellant:
LAURENCE E. PAUL
Amber Gascho, et al v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, et al
as 17-3804
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMBER GASCHO, ASHLEY BUCKENMEYER, MICHAEL J HOGAN and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
TOMI ANNE PULLIAM
Defendant:
GLOBAL FITNESS HOLDINGS, LLC, doing business as Urban Active and DAHL ADMINISTRATION, LLC
Amber Gascho, et al v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, et al
as 17-3805
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMBER GASCHO, ASHLEY BUCKENMEYER, MICHAEL J HOGAN and others
Defendant:
GLOBAL FITNESS HOLDINGS, LLC, doing business as Urban Active and DAHL ADMINISTRATION, LLC
Interested Party - Appellant:
STEPHEN PAUL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.