Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Thomas v. Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
as 3:2017cv00087
Petitioner:
Bruce G. Thomas
Respondent:
Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. United States et al
as 2:2016cv03693
Plaintiff:
Bruce A Thomas
Defendant:
United States, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Edgefield FCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce Thomas v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co
as 15-2556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE B. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
THOMAS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
BRUCE A. THOMAS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and HEALTH SERVICES ET AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Illinois Extension Pipeline Company LLC v. Thomas et al
as 3:2015cv03171
Plaintiff:
Illinois Extension Pipeline Company LLC
Defendant:
Jane A Thomas , Bradley D Thomas , Janelle E Sams-Thomas and others
Counter_claimant:
Sandra S Thomas , Bradley D Thomas , Sarah K Holt and others
Counter_defendant:
Illinois Extension Pipeline Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co
as 3:2015cv01604
Plaintiff:
Bruce B Thomas
Defendant:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. United States of America
as 9:2013cv81269
Plaintiff:
Bruce Calvin Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bruce Thomas v. Warden Stevenson
as 13-6708
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRUCE B. THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN STEVENSON
USA v. Bruce Thoma
as 13-11778
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRUCE CALVIN THOMAS
Thomas v. Wright Medical Technology, INC. et al
as 4:2012cv01998
Plaintiff:
Bruce V. Thomas
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
