Cases 11 - 20 of 783
Newkirk v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Warden Artrip, Investigator Harris, Assistant Warden Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. K. Fleming
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT K. M. FLEMING, HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Dept. of Corrections and others
Butler v. Eddy et al.
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Benjanell Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Andrew Eddy, David Caudill and Landon Kohls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caudill #479314 v. Morrow et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lee Caudill #479314
Defendant:
Unknown Morrow, Unknown Nevins and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutter v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Damien Rutter
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mackey
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Director of Security Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Henderson, et al.
as 24-983
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J MOORE
Defendant:
RICHARD L HENDERSON, MD, TIMOTHY G CAUDILL, MD, SIR REYES, PA and others
Kalitvintsev et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Maxim Kalitvintsev and Elena Chudnaia
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Richison v. Chapman et al
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richison
Defendant:
CO Aaron Chapman, CO Joel Hammer, CO Ashley Husk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caudill v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Darren D. Caudill
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
