Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 146
USA v. Christopher Grider
as 23-3103
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Christopher Ray Grider
Robertson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00077
Petitioner: Christopher Ray Robertson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ROBINSON v. WARDEN
as 3:2023cv00080
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER RAY ROBINSON
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EUDY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00228
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER RAY EUDY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hamby v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv03269
Plaintiff: Christopher Ray Hamby
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party: SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
USA v. Lovington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-10881
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Christopher Ray Lovington
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05328
Defendant: KNUCKLES, KOMOSINSKI & MANFRO, LLP, BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, PC, Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Chris Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FULLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12153
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER RAY FULLER
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GODFREY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12460
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER RAY GODFREY and CHRISTOPHER R GODFREY
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rogers v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50226
Petitioner: Christopher Ray Rogers
Respondent: A.U.S.P. Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?