Cases 11 - 20 of 479
Hawley, Philip v. Cromwell et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Philip Hawley
Defendant:
Warden Cromwell, Kevin Carr, Brian Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kearney, Michael v. Cromwell, Daniel et al
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Kearney
Defendant:
Daniel Cromwell, Corey Rahlf, Sheldon Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromwell v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Shane Cromwell
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Patterson v. Office of the Attorney General Child Support Division, et al.
as 7:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Jor'dea-Drael: Patterson
Defendant:
Office of the Attorney General Child Support Division, Donna Hoawrton, Jessica Magnus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holt v. City of Lincoln, Nebraska et al
as 4:2023cv03239
Plaintiff:
Jeffery L. Holt and Jeffrey L. Holt, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, Ayars and Ayars, Drew Cromwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nelson v Labby
as 2:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
Mark Nelson
Defendant:
Daniel M. Cromwell and Kira Labby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASSAQUOI v. ODDO et al
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
LEONARD J. ODDO, C. Glass, Vicki Vaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays, Gary v. Cromwell, Dan
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner:
Gary C. Mays, Jr.
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Klass v. Yamhill County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Klass
Defendant:
Yamhill County Sheriff's Department and Alex Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
