Cases 11 - 20 of 225
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taylor v. Del Toro
as 1:2024cv11479
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro
Interested Party:
US Attorney for the District of Massachusetts
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Taylor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00898
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7101 Labor-Management Relations (Findings and Purpose)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05375
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jerome Johnson v. Carlos Del Toro
as 24-5128
Plaintiff:
Jerome W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro, Secretary, U.S. Department of Navy
Tee v. Shea et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Ignatius M Tee, Jr.
Defendant:
Shannon M Shea and Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
VOEGELI v. DEL TORO
as 1:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS VOEGELI
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.