Cases 11 - 20 of 43
klotz v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv06534
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GIBBS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON, CORIZON HEALTH and others
Plaintiff:
Helen klotz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dustin v. Childress et al
as 4:2020cv02793
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Johnson, Correctional Officer Atkinson, Sgt. Bremner and others
Plaintiff:
D. Dustin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Wiggins v. Correctional Officer Johnson
as 19-7632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD L. WIGGINS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Allen v. Johnson
as 5:2019ct03233
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Johnson
Plaintiff:
Arthur Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Meeks v. Campbell, et al
as 19-1510
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT SCATE, WARDEN CAMPBELL, K. KARTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY MEEKS
Hassan v. Johnson Doe et al
as 1:2019cv04111
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Walker Doe, Correctional Officer John Doe, Correctional Officer Brown Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Eslam Hassan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupree v. Clarke et al
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Correctional Officer Johnson, David Call and others
Plaintiff:
Mike Dupree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv00257
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FROSTER, BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CARZELL WALLACE, JR. and CARZELL WALLACE JUNIOR,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03285
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER OKORN et al
as 2:2018cv01400
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER BUZAS, SERGEANT FRIEND, CORRECTIONS OFFICER PHILLIPS and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
