Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Arboneaux et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02114
Plaintiff:
Tebo Onishea, Sean Collett, Trent Arboneaux and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Mason v. Rhodes et al
as 5:2019cv03997
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mason
Defendant:
Jeffrey Bird, Emmett Cunningham, Jr., Restoration Robotics, Inc. and others
Samuel Wani v. George Fox University, et al
as 19-35355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL W. WANI
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVE JOHNSTONE, Associate Dean of Students, Director of Residence Life, CHRIS CASEY, Head Coach, Defensive Line, THOMAS CROY, Dr. and others
Defendant:
PROVIDENCE MEDICAL GROUP
Yzeiraj v. Restoration Robotics, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv03883
Defendant:
Jeffrey Bird, Charlotte Holland, Emmett Cunningham, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Erenik Yzeiraj
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guerrini v. Restoration Robotics, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv03712
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Guerrini
Defendant:
Restoration Robotics, Inc. , Ryan Rhodes , Charlotte Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01575
Petitioner:
Craig Taylor
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Taylor et al
as 4:2017cv04149
Plaintiff:
Craig Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Dane Heady
as 17-6081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
DANE HEADY, Retired Unit Manager, MICHAEL WEAVER, Health Service Administrator, EDDIE ANDERSON, DO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00470
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
