Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Terrance D. Morton Sr. v. County of Los Angeles Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv07185
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles Department of Corrections, County of Los Angeles Department of Corrections, Mental Health Clinicians and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance D. Morton, Sr.
MORTON et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04097
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. MORTON and KEREN F. MORTON
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dopp v. Jones et al
as 5:2014cv00961
Plaintiff:
Richard L Dopp
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Johnny Blevins, Randall Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colasurdo v. Morton et al
as 1:2013cv09293
Plaintiff:
John James Colasurdo
Defendant:
Marcus D. Morton and T. Dralle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Smith v. Chau et al
as 3:2013cv01337
Plaintiff:
Carey Smith
Defendant:
John Chau, G. Casian and D. Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20531
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Morton and Melissa Morton
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited , DePuy Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Chau et al
as 3:2013cv01440
Plaintiff:
Carey Smith
Defendant:
John Chau, G. Casian and D. Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORTON v. WARNER
as 1:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. MORTON
Defendant:
RICHARD WARNER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Morton v. Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc. d/b/a Sears Home Services
as 2:2012cv02941
Plaintiff:
Howard D. Morton
Defendant:
Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc. d/b/a Sears Home Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
