Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Pew v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00668
Defendant:
Shawn P Kenny, Dorina Varner, Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinder v. Reichql et al
as 2:2020cv00047
Defendant:
Robert Floss, Tashor Kelley, William Straughn and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Pinder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Renee Shrimp, 10 A/POC CO's, Jane/John Doe(s) Psychologists and others
Plaintiff:
Kelley O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darien Houser v. Wetzel, et al
as 19-1889
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICA SERVICE GROUP INC, Corizon, DR. PARKS, MANUFACTURE OF RUGBY ANTI DANDRUFF SHAMPOO RUGBY LABORATORIES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIEN HOUSER
Bundy v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv00543
Defendant:
Doctor Jaques LeClerc, Diamond Pharmacy, Judith Rowe and others
Plaintiff:
Zakiyyia Bundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Oakland County Government et al
as 2:2018cv11739
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jones
Defendant:
Oakland County Government, Royal Oak, City of, Southfield, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Oakland County Government et al
as 1:2018cv00555
Plaintiff:
Bryan Jones
Defendant:
Oakland County Government, Royal Oak, City of, Southfield, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv02826
Plaintiff:
Bernard L. Smith
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. , Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUSER v. WIDENOUR et al
as 2:2016cv01039
Defendant:
WETZEL, DR. JIN, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
HOUSER and DARIEN HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
O'Donnell v. Ockenhouse-Donato et al
as 1:2016cv01149
Plaintiff:
Kelley O'Donnell
Defendant:
Ingrid Ockenhouse-Donato, Susquehanna Gastroenterology, Diamond Pharmacy Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
