Cases 11 - 20 of 121
Darrell Smith v. B. Eischen, Warden
as 23-2620
Petitioner / Appellant:
Darrell Smith
Respondent / Appellee:
B. Eischen, FPC Duluth, Warden
Smith et al v. Ford Motor Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
Darrell Smith and Alicia Smith
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Inc.
A v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2023cv02342
Plaintiff:
J A
Defendant:
United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), Ray J. Garcia, Darrell Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Motor City et al
as 8:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Darrell Smith
Defendant:
Motor City and Soc Admemastion 109
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Darrell Smith
as 22-3076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Darrell Smith
Defendant:
Energae, LP, also known as Black Lion Energae Fund, LP, also known as Black Lion Energae, LP, also known as Algae Energae, LP and I-Lenders, LLC, also known as Interested Investors, LLC
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2022cv00516
Petitioner:
ANTOINE DARRELL SMITH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Alvin Darrell Smith v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
United States, Michael D. Carvajal, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Minerva Trevino
Defendant:
Darrell Smith and Vela Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. FUSIMO
as 1:2022cv00089
Petitioner:
ALVIN DARRELL SMITH
Respondent:
J. FUSIMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Utah Department of Agriculture and Food et al
as 4:2021cv00118
Plaintiff:
Darrell Smith
Defendant:
Utah Department of Agriculture and Food, Shann Finslinson, Thane Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
