Cases 11 - 20 of 8,001
JONES v. SYMONETTE et al
as 2:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
ELAINE JONES
Defendant:
ALLAN A. SYMONETTE, BOISE BUTLER, JAMILLA HASBEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dave's Food Group LLC v. Wheat Holdings LLC
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Dave's Food Group LLC
Defendant:
Wheat Holdings LLC doing business as Wheat Montana Farms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Chism v. Long et al
as 8:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Chism
Defendant:
Janet C. Long, Brian Scott, Charles Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mac Project LLC v. High Lonesome Claims et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Mac Project LLC
Defendant:
High Lonesome Claims, High Lonesome Mining, Inc, Richard W. Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mac Project LLC v. High Lonesome Claims et al
as 2:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Mac Project LLC
Defendant:
High Lonesome Claims, High Lonesome Mining, Inc, Richard W. Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shanishchara v. Model N, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02994
Plaintiff:
Kunal Shanishchara
Defendant:
Model N, Inc., Baljit Dail, Tim Adams and others
In Re: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb
as 24-1318
Appellant:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS, Trust
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Vowels v. USPS OIG et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Lesley Vowels
Defendant:
USPS OIG, The State of Kentucky: Kentucky Secretary of State, KY Western District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
