Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Wade v. Truist Bank et al
as 8:2020cv00656
Defendant:
Anna R. Cablik, Suntrust Corp., Steven C. Voorhees and others
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Anna R. Cablik, Suntrust Corp., Steven C. Voorhees and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Rossi Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. BB&T CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00841
Plaintiff:
BREWSTER SMITH, JR , DORIS KIROUAC , CHRISTINA HAWKS and others
Defendant:
BB&T CORPORATION , BB&T CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE , BB&T CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Arlington Capital, LLC v. Bainton McCarthy, LLP, et al
as 15-2543
Debtor:
In the Matter of: GT AUTOMATION GROUP, INCORPORATED
Appellant:
ARLINGTON CAPITAL, LLC
Appellee:
BAINTON MCCARTHY, LLP and SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
Trustee - Trustee:
R. DAVID BOYER, II
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00098
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Garner et al v. Harrod et al
as 2:2013cv00678
Plaintiff:
Cameron D. Garner , Christina L. Garner , Audrey M. Moreland and others
Defendant:
Jessica Harrod, Licking County Department of Job and Family Services, Children Services Division, John Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Boyer v. Fries et al
as 1:2013cv00192
Plaintiff:
R David Boyer
Defendant:
Ken Fries, Richard Horstmeyer, PE #1025 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. David Prince
as 12-10077
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID BOYER PRINCE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
