Cases 11 - 20 of 86
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv16788
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARROL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coston v. Conway
as 20-3563
Plaintiff:
Lando McMurren, Troy Derby, Tyvonni Purnell and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Lt. Miller, Sgt. Carsten, Lorenzo and others
Defendant:
New York State Commission of Corrections, State of New York, Onondaga County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rashod Coston
Torres v. Dye et al
as 5:2020cv00164
Defendant:
FNU Clawson, FNU Brown, Russell Chester and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00532
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
David Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CARROLL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87855
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARROLL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv54178
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coston et al v. Conway et al
as 9:2019cv01552
Plaintiff:
Lando McMurren, Troy Derby, Tyvonni Purnell and others
Defendant:
Mahoney, Peterson, New York State Commission of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
David Stephenson v. William Barr
as 19-5302
Respondent / Appellee:
William P. Barr, Attorney General
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Carroll Stephenson
STEPHENSON v. BARR
as 1:2019cv02161
Petitioner:
DAVID CARROLL STEPHENSON
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
