Cases 11 - 20 of 124
David PattersonIn re: David Patterson
as 22-5683
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID PATTERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Scalable Insights, LLC et al v. Bihrle Applied Research, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
Scalable Insights, LLC and David Patterson
Defendant:
Bihrle Applied Research, Inc., Bar Holdings, Inc., American Robotics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
JACKSON HEWITT INC v. PATTERSON et al
as 2:2022cv00808
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC
Defendant:
KAVE ENTERPRISES, LLC, DAVID PATTERSON and KAY PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Beaumann v. Securus Technologies Inc
as 2:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Haedyn-Khris Raquel Beaumann and Kevin David Patterson
Defendant:
Securus Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bouldin et al
as 3:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Andrew Young Johnson
Defendant:
David Bouldin, David Patterson, Shawn Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PATTERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04486
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv17356
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Patterson v. Doe
as 4:2021cv00665
Plaintiff:
David Patterson
Defendant:
Doe, Lenard Hogg, Cody Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Hogg et al
as 4:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
David Patterson
Defendant:
Leonard Hogg, Clent Todd and Cody Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15551
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
