Cases 11 - 20 of 58
SP Franchising LLC v. Payne et al
as 1:2021cv00497
Defendant:
David Payne and FirstFruits Ventures Corp.
Plaintiff:
SP Franchising, LLC and SP Franchising LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Luttrull et al
as 1:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Jerry Drook, Gregg Melton, Brian Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Earl Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(SS) Payne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv02150
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
David Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(SS) Payne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020at01033
Defendant:
David Payne and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Netro et al v. Amerifield Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv01082
Defendant:
Amerifield Inc, Trisura Specialty Insurance Co and David Payne
Plaintiff:
Jesus Netro and Ana Marlene Figueroa-Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92089
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYNE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02559
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DAVID PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
INFANTE et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03132
Plaintiff:
GRETCHEN BRAY, JOSHUA CASH, HERIBERTO ESPINOZA and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Infante et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02067
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Bray, Joshua Cash, Heriberto Espinoza and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 4:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Jacinta S. Lanham, Mark Saffran, Tommy Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
James Robert McHenry and Freida Darlene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
