Cases 11 - 20 of 24,750
WHARTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06908
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WHARTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dicarlo v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03185
Plaintiff:
Deborah Dicarlo
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Warren et al
as 6:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Daryl L. Davis
Defendant:
Don Warren, Shirley McKellar, Deborah Pullum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wren v. iRobot Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv11498
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wren
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin M. Angle, JULIE ZEILER and others
Shah et al v. Anagnost et al
as 3:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah and Autodesk, Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew Anagnost, Karen Blasing, Reid French and others
Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Deborah A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fragua v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03145
Plaintiff:
Deborah Fragua
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carl Puckett, Jr., et al v. Ain Jeem, Inc., et al
as 24-5537
Plaintiff:
CARL ELLEN PUCKETT, JR. and MARCELLA PUCKETT
Defendant:
AIN JEEM, INC., CHRIS STAVRO, DEBORAH MORALES and others
Williams Goyens-Bell Eberwein v. Denney, et al.
as 24-3561
Defendant:
VICTOR PERNIA, CRAIG S. DENNEY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, N. BELL and others
Plaintiff:
CHALEDEEANNKA DEBORAH ANN WILLIAMS GOYENS-BELL EBERWEIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
