Cases 11 - 20 of 12,287
2425 Candler, LLC v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02575
Plaintiff:
2425 Candler, LLC doing business as Candler Village
Defendant:
Derrick Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOOD v. GASKIN et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOOD
Defendant:
RICHARD GASKIN and DEZARAY WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Darrick Ferguson
as 24-2178
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Darrick Lynn Ferguson, also known as Derrick Lynn Ferguson
Newland Hambrick v. Kimberly Maki, et al
as 24-2180
Plaintiff:
Newland Derrick Hambrick
Defendant:
Kimberly Maki, St. Louis County Attorney, Leslie Biers, St. Louis County Judge, Victoria Denise Wanta, Assistant County Attorney and others
Van v. Penzone
as 2:2024cv01399
Petitioner:
Derrick Julius Van
Respondent:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC)Patton v. Wasco State Prison
as 1:2024cv00669
Petitioner:
Derrick T. Patton
Respondent:
Wasco State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paterson v. The Sygma Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04118
Plaintiff:
Kairi Anthony Paterson
Defendant:
The Sygma Network, Inc. and Derrick McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Barnett (ID 86695) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Barnett
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Tommy Williams, Dana L. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANGER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
DERRICK GRANGER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
