Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Isaza v. Trotter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00891
Defendant: Farmers Insurance and Earl Marshall Trotter
Plaintiff: Rigoberto Enrique Isaza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isaza v. Trotter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00632
Defendant: Farmers Insurance and Earl Marshal Trotter
Plaintiff: Rigoberto Enrique Isaza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall vs. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff: Earl Marshall and Bridget Marshall
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Jonathon Marshall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-20141
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JONATHON EARL MARSHALL
US v. Robert Marshall
as 11-6270
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ROBERT EARL MARSHALL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1781
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marshall v. O'Brien We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2009cv00424
Petitioner: Robert Earl Marshall
Respondent: Terry O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARSHALL v. A.C. AND S., INC, (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv84467
Plaintiff: ROSCOE EARL MARSHALL
Defendant: A.C. AND S., INC, (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2009cv01503
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?