Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Lusk et al v. Federated Service Insurance Company et al
as 3:2018cv00981
Plaintiff:
Khalil Lusk, Alexus Dauzat and Jason Lusk
Defendant:
Edward Cunningham, Federated Service Insurance Company, Sun Coast Resources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv05467
Defendant:
Undercover #277, Edward Cunningham, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Shahleek Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cunningham et al v. The United States of America
as 3:2017cv02521
Plaintiff:
M. Edward Cunningham, II and R. E. C.
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MCKENNA v. MIGNELLA et al
as 5:2016cv01017
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW D. MCKENNA
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. MIGNELLA, MICHAEL SHALE, TIMOTHY VANHISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herbert et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15863
Plaintiff:
Teresa J. Herbert and Edward Cunningham
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Estep et al
as 5:2011cv00371
Plaintiff:
Walter Wayne Brown, Jr. and Winona Jean Enarson Brown
Defendant:
Jan Estep, David M. Applegate , Brian T. Moynihan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cunningham v. Grounds
as 5:2011cv05576
Petitioner:
John Edward Cunningham, Jr.
Respondent:
R. Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tung et al v. Cunningham
as 1:2011cv03729
Defendant:
Detective Edward Cunningham
Plaintiff:
Andre Padro and Jason Tung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edward Cunningham v. Sec. Dept. Corrections, et al
as 10-14691
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD CUNNINGHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Cunningham v. Geren
as 2:2009cv00333
Plaintiff:
Evelio Edward Cunningham
Defendant:
The Honorable Pete Geren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
