Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 64
In re: Harold Stanley
as 19-5047
Undetermined: Gregory Albert Darst, Todd Brandon Casey, James Back and others
In re: Robert McNeil
as 19-5041
Undetermined: Mark Crumpacker, Gregory Albert Darst, Louis Ronald Depolo and others
Brooks #290932 v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00963
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner: Michael Eugene Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Michael Ellis, et al
as 17-5141
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Michael Beals Ellis, Robert A. McNeil, Harold R. Stanley and others
: , , and others
STANLEY et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff: HAROLD R. STANLEY, MICHAEL BEALS ELLIS and ROBERT A. MCNEIL
Defendant: LORETTA E. LYNCH, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and JOHN KOSKINEN
Movant: BARRY EUGENE BROOKS and WILLIAM B. MCGARVIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Randall Brooks v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-10647
Petitioner - Appellant: DR. RANDALL EUGENE BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Christopher E. Brooks v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-15732
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER EUGENE BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Brooks v. Stephens We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00528
Petitioner: Randall Eugene Brooks
Respondent: William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Commonwealth of Kentucky We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00057
Petitioner: Carlos Eugene Brooks
Respondent: Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Reiser We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2014cv03007
Petitioner: Wesley Eugene Brooks
Respondent: Bruce Reiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?