Cases 11 - 20 of 863
Quinn v. Nasera et al
as 2:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Trellis Quinn
Defendant:
Gabriela Nasera, Locher, Jose Navarrete and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ELLIS v. FONSECA et al
as 1:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
FONSECA, CHAD EVANS, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fonseca v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 1:16-cr-10215-3
as 1:2024cv10683
Petitioner:
Nuno Fonseca
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Giobel Canete v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1532
Petitioner:
Giobel Fonseca Canete
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Fonseca et al v. San Jorge Children's Hospital Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Monica Fonseca and Monica Valentina Martinez
Defendant:
San Jorge Children's Hospital Inc., Continental Insurance Company, Robert Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Fonseca v. Blinken
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Bianca Lizeth Fonseca
Defendant:
Antony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Creation of a Remedy - Declaration of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
