Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Johnson v. Adams et al
as 2:2018cv00134
Defendant:
Minor Adams, Mike Byrne and Jo Gentry
Plaintiff:
Francis Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2014cv01425
Defendant:
Correction Officer Flores-Nava, Nevada Department of Corrections, Trinity Pharris and others
702) 486-3283 (fax:
Raelene K. Palmer, Raelene K. Palmer and Raelene K. Palmer
Plaintiff:
Francis Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Charles Francis Johnson and Robin Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Matthew Thomas King and Mark Jamalian King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Williams v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv00457
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry May, Aundrea Weekly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens et al v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
Lance Mitchell Owens, Heath Banks, Scotty L Eoff and others
Defendant:
Artis Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelley, Rex Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALTHAZOR v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv62006
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIRE BRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. AW CHESTERON COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv92456
Plaintiff:
JAMES FRANCIS JOHNSON and ARILLA N. JOHNSON
Defendant:
AW CHESTERON COMPANY, INC., BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP, BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Johnson et al v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 0:2009cv02770
Plaintiff:
James Francis Johnson and Arilla N Johnson
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, Bayer CropScience LP, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv05035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
