Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Smith v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceuticals Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07547
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leslie Smith v. Tehama County Sheriff's Dept., et al
as 19-15063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESLIE GORDON SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
C. GIBSON, Warden and TEHAMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
BRANSON v. USF HOLLAND, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03608
Plaintiff:
JERRI ANN BRANSON
Defendant:
USF HOLLAND, LLC and GORDON SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Cruz et al
as 3:2018cv02333
Defendant:
Juan Carlos Cruz and Deal Finder LLC
Plaintiff:
Gordon Smith
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Gordon-Smith v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv02605
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Barbara Gordon-Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Smith
as 2:2018cv03920
Defendant:
Gordon Smith, Sr.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Garrison-Griffis v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00381
Plaintiff:
Angel Garrison-Griffis
Defendant:
Gordon Smith, Deputy William Murray, Detective Sgt. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon Smith v. David Angelo, et al
as 17-2389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GORDON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ANGELO, Delaware Department of Corrections, ROBERT COUPE, Delaware State Police, JAMES FRALEY, Delaware State Police and others
Fulkerson v. Russell et al
as 3:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Fulkerson
Defendant:
Gail S. Russell, Kevin D. Mueller, Gordon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guido Karp v. Thump Publisihing Limited et al
as 2:2016cv09227
Defendant:
Does, Richard Gordon Smith and Thump Publisihing Limited
Plaintiff:
Guido Karp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
