Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Darnis et al v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv01171
Defendant:
John H. Walker, Carrier Global Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Maurer, Christopher Doot, David Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG v. United Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv03570
Plaintiff:
FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment Luxemburg AG
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, Gregory J. Hayes and Akhil Johri
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
York et al v. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY 12th MAN FOUNDATION a/k/a THE 12TH MAN FOUNDATION
as 2:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Sammy D York , Henry H Holubec and Gregory R Hayes
Defendant:
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY 12th MAN FOUNDATION a/k/a THE 12TH MAN FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Moore et al
as 7:2014cv00143
Defendant:
Anthony Moore and Moores Produce, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Delores Anderson , Ennis Brown, Jr. , Feridnand Basile and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Soldiers and Sailors Employment and Reemployment Act
USA v. Gregory Haye
as 13-35932
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY DALE HAYES
United States of America v. Hayes
as 3:2013cv00025
Defendant:
Gregory D. Hayes
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
USA v. Gregory Haye
as 11-30159
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY DALE HAYES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
