Cases 11 - 20 of 937
J.S. v. Hinkle et al
as 4:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
J.S.
Defendant:
Warden Thomas Ray Hinkle, Andrew Jones, Patrick Pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kelly v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mark William Kelly
Defendant:
Pima County Sheriff's Department, Gina M Lumia, Guy Marchal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Hinkle
as 23-8036
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HOWARD HINKLE, JR.
MILLS v. CIRCLE CITY STATION POST OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv02205
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MILLS
Defendant:
CIRCLE CITY STATION POST OFFICE, HINKLE and UNIDENTIFIED EMPLOYEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Hinkle
as 23-7823
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DILLON ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellant:
HOWARD HINKLE, JR.
(PS) Schwettmann III v. Starns et al
as 2:2023cv02442
Plaintiff:
Dale Schwettmann III
Defendant:
Brook Starns, Rayman Dorman, Daniel Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HINKLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30781
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN HINKLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HINKLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16427
Plaintiff:
PAUL HINKLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HINKLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11766
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SCOTT HINKLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
