Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Jennings et al v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Hollis Jennings , Thomas Wick , Dennis Patterson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Smith et al
as 4:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
Howard Ray Martin
Defendant:
Robert T Smith, Ace Pilot Car Services LLC and Unlimited Freight LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnes v. USA-2255
as 8:2016cv01548
Defendant:
Howard Ray Barnes
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fleming v. Maryland Department of Safety
as 1:2016cv01412
Plaintiff:
Willie Hernandez Fleming
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Safety, Ricky Foxwell, Mrs. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparkman v. Jordan Health Services et al
as 1:2014cv00428
Petitioner:
Howard Ray Sparkman
Respondent:
Jordan Health Services and Anthony Alonso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kevin Jackson v. Rick Foxwell
as 14-7110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN JACKSON
Plaintiff:
EMERY FLOREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK FOXWELL, Warden, MARTIN O'MALLEY, GARY D. MAYNARD and others
Jalloh v. Simmons et al
as 1:2014cv02024
Plaintiff:
Siaka Tejan Jalloh
Defendant:
Melissa Simmons, E. Orndoff, J. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jay Stone, et al v. Board of Election Commissione
as 13-2733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY STONE, FREDERICK WHITE, FRANK L. COCONATE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS FOR THE CITY OF CHICAGO
Smith et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv06703
Plaintiff:
Nena Rose Smith and Howard Ray Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Trapp v. Sanders
as 6:2013cv03023
Petitioner:
Howard Ray Trapp, Jr.
Respondent:
Linda Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
