Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Adams v. Tegels et al
as 3:2018cv00971
Defendant:
Ms. Tidquist, RN Pralle, Nurse Hentz and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen Adams and Paul Adams
Undetermined:
DCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Tegels et al
as 2:2018cv01556
Defendant:
Tidquist, Hentz, Hulstein and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Larson et al
as 2:2018cv01557
Defendant:
Dr Steliga, Hentz, Ms Huber and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hulstein v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14556
Plaintiff:
Jane Hulstein
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tony Hulstein v. Drug Enforcement Admin.
as 11-2039
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Tony Hulstein
Defendant - Appellant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Hulstein v. Dodds et al
as 5:2011cv04039
Plaintiff:
Tony Hulstein
Defendant:
Zane Dodds, Chris Zangari, J D Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hulstein v. Drug Enforcement Administration -- SEE #43 ORDER STAYING JUDGMENT, ALSO SET PRODUCTION DDL FOR 30 DAYS AFTER 8CC MANDATE--SEE #44 ORDER TO SET DDL FOR RESPONSE TO ATTY FEE MOTION 30 DAYS AFTER 8CC MANDATE
as 5:2010cv04112
Plaintiff:
Tony Hulstein
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
United States v. Tony Hulstein
as 10-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Tony Hulstein
McFarland v. McFarland et al
as 5:2009cv04047
Plaintiff:
Burns H McFarland
Defendant:
Robin McFarland, Dori Groenendyk, Robin's School Of Dance & Tumbling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
