Cases 11 - 20 of 152
Arthur Edward Ezor v. Betty T. Yee et al
as 2:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Arthur Edward Ezor
Defendant:
Betty T. Yee, State Bar of California, Leah T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hymes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2022cv02922
Petitioner:
Jarre Deon Hymes
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hymes v. Fender
as 1:2022cv02010
Petitioner:
Jason Hymes
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Urbina v. Hildebrand
as 3:2022cv00853
Petitioner:
Hyme J. Urbina
Respondent:
Warden Jenny Hildebrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
A. Edward Ezor v. Betty T. Yee et al
as 2:2022cv00840
Plaintiff:
A. Edward Ezor
Defendant:
Betty T. Yee, State Bar of California, Leah T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hymes et al v. Ace American Insurance Co et al
as 5:2021cv02435
Plaintiff:
Omoria Hymes and Joshua Jennings
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Co, Professional Transportation Inc, Randall James and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Mackel v. Pennock et al
as 4:2021cv04026
Defendant:
Heather Hymes, Jeremie Seymour, Paula Lodge and others
Plaintiff:
David Mackel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hymes v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 21-403
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Saul R. Hymes
Defendant / Appellant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
