Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Huang v. Presbyterian Church (USA) et al
as 3:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jeff Huang
Defendant:
Presbyterian Church (USA), University of Pikeville, Linda Dunatov and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Federico Rosas v. Holland et al
as 1:2014cv01219
Plaintiff:
Federico Rosas
Defendant:
K. Holland, P. Matzen, E. Bega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baird et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04859
Plaintiff:
Margaret J. Baird and Joseph M. Baird
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carpenter et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al.
as 2:2013cv32918
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Carpenter , Catherine Pallas , Rosietta Loyd and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Kathryn Carpenter et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc., et al.
as CAC/2:13-cv-06022
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Carpenter , Catherine Pallas , Rosietta Loyd and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Holdings Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc. and others
Kathryn Carpenter et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc., et al.
as 2:2013cv06022
Plaintiff:
Mary Aday, Faye M. Alexander, Eugenia Alldredge and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Holdings Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc., Does and others
In re: B & P Baird Holding
as 13-8013
Debtor:
In re: B & P BAIRD HOLDINGS, INC.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES W. BOYD
Defendant:
KING PAR, LLC and WILLIAM J. BAIRD
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA BAIRD
Baird et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv08902
Plaintiff:
Marleah Deaton Baird and Kenneth J. Baird
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
