Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Estate of Jessica Brown v. City of Lucedale, Mississippi
as 20-60693
Defendant / Appellee:
George County, Mississippi
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Estate of Jessica Danielle Brown
DANIELS v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01172
Plaintiff:
JESSICA DANIELS
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTCIAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv14169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carroll v. City of Lucedale, Mississippi et al
as 1:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jessica Danielle Brown Carroll
Defendant:
City of Lucedale, Mississippi, George County, Mississippi and Warren Avery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelica Daniels v. USA
as 16-17495
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHELICA JESSICA DANIELS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniels v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00128
Petitioner:
Shelica Jessica Daniels
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daniel v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv02395
Plaintiff:
Jessica Daniel
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jamie Beard v. Jessica Daniel, et al
as 11-60832
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMIE BEARD
Defendant - Appellant:
JESSICA DANIEL, J. DANIEL DESIGNS, L.L.C., ERICA LEE and others
Daniels et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv05763
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Joseph Fernandez and John and Jane Doe 1 through 4
Plaintiff:
Jessica Daniels, Tavia Daniels and Todd Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beard v. Daniel et al
as 3:2011cv00472
Plaintiff:
Jamie Beard
Defendant:
Jessica Daniel , J. Daniel Designs LLC , Erica Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
