Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Willie Wilder v. James McKinney
as 16-3518
Petitioner - Appellant:
Willie James Wilder
Respondent:
Iowa, State of
Respondent - Appellee:
James McKinney
United States of America v. Wilder
as 2:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Wilder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
WILDER v. RIDDELL, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00443
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILDER
Defendant:
RIDDELL, INC. , ALL AMERICAN SPORTS, INC. , RIDDELL SPORTS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHRISTOPHER JAMES WILDER v. USA
as 2:2015cv02339
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher James Wilder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wilder v. State of Iowa
as 3:2015cv03107
Petitioner:
Willie James Wilder
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHRISTOPHER JAMES WILDER v. USA
as 2:2014cv00888
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher James Wilder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jesse Yarborough v. J. Norwood, et al
as 14-55785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE YARBOROUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
J. L. NORWOOD, JESUS FERNANDEZ, Medical Doctor, T. CINTORA, Counselor and others
Defendant:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Official Capacity, BROUGHTON, Case Manager, Official Capacity, R. KRIK, Officer, Official Capacity and others
Wilder et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv29602
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Wilder and James Wilder
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilder v. Clay
as 4:2013cv00616
Petitioner:
Christopher James Wilder
Respondent:
Becky Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MATHEWS et al v. FIRST CLASS FACILITY MAINT LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00395
Plaintiff:
ROSALLIA MATHEWS , DEBORAH CASON and JAMES WILDER
Defendant:
FIRST CLASS FACILITY MAINT LLC, SCOTT LITTLEFIELD and CLAY LITTLEFIELD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
