Cases 11 - 20 of 35,723
Marcum v. Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women
as 2:2024cv02645
Petitioner:
Jennifer L Marcum
Respondent:
Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glenn et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Ashley Glenn, Terrie Hood, Kylie Sorge and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.
Delano (PS) v. Hansen et al
as 1:2024cv01428
Petitioner:
Delano Medina and Medina Delano
Respondent:
Jennifer Hansen and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00778
Petitioner:
JENNIFER ALLEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of SSA Decision SSID - SSI Disability Cases
Rivas Paulino v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21920
Plaintiff:
Jennifer E. Rivas Paulino
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hecker et al v. Ionia, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hecker, Estate of David Hendershot and Daniel Hendershot
Defendant:
Ionia County and Judith Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER WILLIAMS CARROLL
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and TSG RESOURCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
