Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Cannon
as 4:2021xc00843
Not Classified By Court:
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
John Cannon v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 21-1867
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CANNON
John Cannon v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 21-2137
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CANNON
Gray v. Forsythe et al
as 2:2021cv00567
Plaintiff:
Nicole Anastasia Gray
Defendant:
John W Kittredge, Donald W Beatty, Kaye G Hearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANNON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14605
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Cannon v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 20-3517
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CANNON
Bellamy (ID 53454) v. Cline et al
as 5:2020cv03229
Defendant:
John Cannon, (fnu) Does 9-11, Dylan Darter and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Allen Bellamy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CANNON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv79506
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cannon v. MERCK & CO, INC et al
as 2:2020cv01525
Defendant:
MERCK & CO, INC and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Plaintiff:
John Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cannon et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00523
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Gail Cannon and John Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
