Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Wade v. Miller et al
as 2:2013cv00861
Plaintiff:
E K Wade
Defendant:
Jeff Miller, Gary Ackerman, Sandy Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chris Walters v. Patrick Leahy, et al
as 13-35019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS WALTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK J. LEAHY, U.S. Senator, Hon., CARL LEVIN, U.S. Senator, Hon. and JOHN CONYERS, Jr., US Congressman, Hon.
Walters v. Leahy et al
as 9:2012cv00184
Plaintiff:
Chris Walters
Defendant:
Patrick Leahy, Carl Levin and John Conyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Perales v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00957
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Vulcan Inc, William Henry Gates, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales v. United States of America et al
as 6:2012cv00520
Defendant:
G. Auerbach, Brian Beckwith, Roy Blunt and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Perales v. Boehner et al
as 2:2012cv00456
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
John Boehner, James E Clyburn, David R Obey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams v Tyson Foods Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02285
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc, Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Azael Dythian Perales v. Virgin Mobile USA et al
as 8:2011cv01656
Defendant:
Jeff Auman, BBVA, BNP Paribas and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
KUCINICH et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2011cv01096
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KUCINICH , WALTER B. JONES , JOHN CONYERS, JR. and others
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA and ROBERT GATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dale Adams v. Tyson Foods, et al
as 11-3180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale Brent Adams
Defendant - Appellee:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Leland E. Tollett, Exec, Albert C. Zapanta, Exec and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
