Cases 11 - 20 of 859
Johns Manville Corporation v. NLRB
as 23-60075
Petitioner:
Johns Manville Corporation
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Teamsters Local 20 v. Johns Manville
as 22-3897
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 20
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHNS MANVILLE
In re: Knauf Insulation, Inc.
as 22-166
Petitioner:
In re: KNAUF INSULATION, INC. and KNAUF INSULATION SPRL
Respondent:
JOHNS MANVILLE CORPORATION, JOHNS MANVILLE, INC. and KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Chase Manufacturing v. Johns Manville Corporation
as 22-1164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASE MANUFACTURING, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNS MANVILLE CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Teamsters v. Johns Manville Corporation
as 3:2021cv02030
Plaintiff:
Local 20 Teamsters
Defendant:
Johns Manville Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
KNAUF INSULATION, LLC et al v. JOHNS MANVILLE CORPORATION, et al.
as 1:2015cv00111
Defendant:
JOHNS MANVILLE CORPORATION and JOHNS MANVILLE, INC.
Counter Defendant:
KNAUF INSULATION, LLC, KNAUF INSULATION GmbH and KNAUF INSULATION SPRL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Nolan v. Johns-Manville, et al
as 2:2021cv60007
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Nolan
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE, Inc. Owens-Illinois, OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Volpini, et al v. Johns-Manville, et al
as 2:2021cv60012
Plaintiff:
Louis P. Volpini and Lucrecia Volpini
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE, Inc. Owens-Illinois, Owens-Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
