Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Butler v. Cox et al
as 2:2018cv00566
Plaintiff:
Joseph Butler
Defendant:
Sherwood Britt Cox and Daybreak Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martell Brownlee v. James Zenk, et al
as 17-3461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTELL BROWNLEE
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES ZENK, TODD SHEFFLER, ROBERT FISHEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Estrada
as 16-4057
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Frank Estrada, AKA The Terminator, AKA Big Dog, AKA Frankie Estrada, AKA Mustard, Isaias Soler, AKA Eso, Nelson Carrasquillo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Edward Estrada, AKA French Fry, AKA Fry
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BUTLER v. SENEX SERVICES CORP. et al
as 1:2015cv00381
Defendant:
BALEKIAN HAYES, PLLC and SENEX SERVICES CORP.
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Butler
as 1:2012mc91199
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Joseph Butler
Daniels v. Quarterman et al
as 2:2009cv00299
Plaintiff:
Danny Daniels
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Ernest H Gutierrez, Jr, Norris Jackson and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Butler v. A.m. Lockett & Co., Ltd., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-78745
Defendant:
A.m. Lockett & Co., Ltd
Plaintiff:
Joseph Butler
Allen et al v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2008cv04302
Plaintiff:
Alton Allen, Alton Allen, Adrian Anthony Andrews and others
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0742 Suits in Admiralty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
