Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Simmons et al v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Maria Simmons, Thanh Le, Timothy Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dolis v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv00550
Defendant:
Michael Cummings, Patrick M. Sheehan, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
James Dolis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baity et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv01367
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray, Kevin Baity, April Ray and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. PRIMECARE HEALTH et al
as 2:2020cv00783
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHRISTOPHER BROWN
Defendant:
PRIMECARE HEALTH INC., CHESTER COUNTY PRISON and KAREN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KYLE v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2020cv00636
Defendant:
EDWARD MCFADDEN, KAREN MURPHY, DOCTOR VICTORIA GESSNER and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEROY KYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2018cv04761
Defendant:
LPN MARKELLE POWELL, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., WARDEN D. EDWARD MCFADDEN and others
Plaintiff:
BRENTON A. FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. First Service Residential
as 5:2017cv00717
Defendant:
Firstservice Residential Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Karen Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Family & Medical Leave Act
Karen Murphy v. Nancy Berryhill
as 17-2017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN MURPHY
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Nohr v. Jang et al
as 2:2017mc00002
Plaintiff:
Jason L Nohr
Defendant:
Corinna Jang, Chris Litsey, Patrick Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
RICHARDSON v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05490
Plaintiff:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. and KAREN MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
