Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Jordan v. USA
as 1:2016cv01421
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Todd Mattox v. Adam Edelman, et al
as 16-1412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD MATTOX
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM EDELMAN, ADRIANNE M. NEFF, HANRESH PANDYA, M.D. and others
Jordan v. BGHA, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00223
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jordan
Defendant:
BGHA, Inc. and Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles A. Brooks v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 15-3677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES A. BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT MCFADDEN, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director and others
Jordan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06739
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe and Fayaz Khan
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pearson et al v. C & J General Contractors, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv12467
Defendant:
C & J General Contractors, Inc. , Sam Worthy and Kenneth Jordan
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Pearson , Isiah Williams and Antwaun Anderson
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 601
BROOKS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2015cv00080
Defendant:
Mr. BLAIR, Mr. CASTENA, Mr. CASTENEDA and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES AARON BROOKS
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
JORDAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JORDAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Jordan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06332
Defendant:
Adolfo Berrios, City of New York and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
