Cases 11 - 20 of 37
C. Holmes v. James Holmes
as 21-181
Respondent:
JAMES KEVIN HOLMES
Petitioner:
C. HOLMES, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, M.D., a/k/a Cynthia Collie Holmes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03376
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32557
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DORADO et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01377
Plaintiff:
ARON FARMER, ANDREW DUTIL, CHRIS HAGEN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dorado et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00969
Plaintiff:
Aron Farmer, Andrew Dutil, Chris Hagen and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HOLMES v. CREDIT BUSINESS SERVICES INC
as 4:2018cv00582
Defendant:
CREDIT BUSINESS SERVICES,INC. and CREDIT BUSINESS SERVICES INC
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holmes v. Starr et al
as 2:2018cv00446
Plaintiff:
Kevin Holmes
Defendant:
Melba Starr, C. Barber, N. Gaughan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Holmes v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 17-31000
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN HOLMES
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Boyd v. Earnshaw et al
as 2:2017cv00921
Plaintiff:
Matthew Benjamin Boyd
Defendant:
Dallas Earnshaw, Kevin Holmes and Elmo L. Growell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laney et al v. Redback Coil Tubing, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00650
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Adams, Kevin Holmes, David Laney and others
Defendant:
Dante Domenichelli, David Droke, Mike Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
