Cases
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Kearin v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv04111
Plaintiff: Rana Kearin
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03207
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Clayton v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv00070
Plaintiff: Earnest Barnard Clayton
Defendant: Stanley Williams, Kristy Parker, Calvin Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohammadi et al v. Audi AG et al
as 3:2017cv02440
Plaintiff: Neda Mohammadi , Athena Nelson , Anand Agrawal and others
Defendant: Audi of America LLC and Audi AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Clayton v. Murray, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2016cv00143
Plaintiff: Ernest Clayton
Defendant: Dennis Murray, Emmitt Donahue, Brian Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearins v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company et al
as 7:2014cv04942
Plaintiff: Alice Kearins
Defendant: The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company and Timothy Regan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kearins v. Panalpina, Inc.
as 13-3142
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: Michael J. Kearins, as successor of interest to Pinnacle Interior Elements, Ltd.
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Pinnacle Interior Elements, Ltd.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: Panalpina, Inc.
Kearins et al v. Panalpina, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01198
Plaintiff: Michael J. Kearins and Pinnacle Interior Elements, LTD.
Defendant: Panalpina, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Crowe v. Kearin et al
as 1:2007cv05289
Plaintiff: Douglas M. Crowe
Defendant: John J. Kearin, John J. Kearin, Vincent Donofrio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?